Talk: Texture pack

Latest revision as of 05:39, 13 February 2021

(untitled)

someone should delete this page and move any important information that is missing from the Texture Pack page. Idiotioc. –Preceding unsigned comment was added by Idiotioc (talk • contribs) at 21:30, 05 February 2011 (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~

List of texture packs

Since this page is still relevant as older version information, and since the wiki is not being a hosting site for texture packs, should theList of texture packs links be removed? I know the pages are being kept as an archive, but I am wondering about the links on the current version of the page. --KnightMiner ^(t|c) 02:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Move installation section

The installation section of this page should be moved into its own page rather on this page. This is to keep consistency with pages such as Add-on, Resource pack, and Data pack. Skylord wars (talk) 00:59, 1 May 2018 (UTC) Skylord wars

When was support for HD texture packs added?

The history table shows that 16×16 texture packs were officially supported in alpha v1.2.2, but when was support added for texture packs other than 16×16? And was that for both bigger (32×32 etc), smaller (8×8 etc), or both? --Thatcactusgirl (talk) 01:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Redirect to Resource Pack

In the modern day, the term "texture pack" is usually used to refer to resource packs which only change textures, both officially by Mojang (in the Bedrock marketplace) and in the community. Given that "actual" texture packs have been unsupported for over 7 years (and were never supported on Bedrock to begin with), it's pretty unlikely that someone looking for information about "texture packs" would be actually looking for this page. As such, I propose moving this page to Texture Pack/old or something similar, and replacing the current page with a redirect to Resource Pack. Is this a good idea? I'd like to hear other people's thoughts on this. - Luke18033 (talk) 02:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Oppose for a few reasons

They are 2 very different things. It's like comparing Old Customized to Custom
Texture Pack/old is not a good idea. Subpages are not good and why make a subpage as a redirect?
As for someone looking for "texture packs", there is already a hatnote ontop.

All in all, I oppose.Humiebee^{talk contribs} 03:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

It doesn't need to be a subpage, that's just the first thing that came to mind. It could be Old Texture Pack or Texture Pack (old) instead. But the big outdated infobox at the top of the page makes it pretty obvious that this is an old feature so maybe this change isn't really necessary. - Luke18033 (talk) 05:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{/Archive nav}}
-Is this page for the official texture packs or can we add our own? [[User:Jaeil|Jaeil]] 18:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
+== (untitled) ==
-:it's for texture packs of all sorts, but I figure, using this system, we can sort out what is and isn't supporting the new texture pack support in Minecraft.--[[User:Kizzycocoa|Kizzycocoa]] 18:31, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
+someone should delete this page and move any important information that is missing from the Texture Pack page. Idiotioc. <small>–Preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Idiotioc|Idiotioc]] ([[User talk:Idiotioc|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Idiotioc|contribs]]) at 21:30, 05 February 2011 (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~<nowiki/>~~</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!-- Template:AutoUnsigned -->
-::Is there a texture pack that doesn't support the texture pack support?  As far as I tried, everything seemed to work.  Are there some images that can't be replaced?  Is this the hellstone/water thing?  I'm a bit confused. [[User:Jaeil|Jaeil]] 20:22, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
-:::well, yes. but I mean those specially modified to use the texture mod thing. not like, the ones where you download the terrain.png etc.--[[User:Kizzycocoa|Kizzycocoa]] 20:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
+== List of texture packs ==
+Since this page is still relevant as older version information, and since the wiki is not being a hosting site for texture packs, should the[[Texture pack#List of texture packs|List of texture packs]] links be removed? I know the pages are being kept as an archive, but I am wondering about the links on the current version of the page. --'''[[User:KnightMiner|<font color=#088>KnightMiner</font>]]''' <sup>([[User talk:KnightMiner|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/KnightMiner|c]])</sup> 02:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
+== Move installation section ==
+The installation section of this page should be moved into its own page rather on this page. This is to keep consistency with pages such as [[Add-on]], [[Resource pack]], and [[Data pack]]. [[User:Skylord wars|Skylord wars]] ([[User talk:Skylord wars|talk]]) 00:59, 1 May 2018 (UTC) [[User:Skylord wars|Skylord wars]]
+== When was support for HD texture packs added? ==
+The history table shows that 16×16 texture packs were officially supported in alpha v1.2.2, but when was support added for texture packs other than 16×16? And was that for both bigger (32×32 etc), smaller (8×8 etc), or both?
+--[[User:Thatcactusgirl|Thatcactusgirl]] ([[User talk:Thatcactusgirl|talk]]) 01:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
+== Redirect to Resource Pack ==
+In the modern day, the term "texture pack" is usually used to refer to resource packs which only change textures, both officially by Mojang (in the Bedrock marketplace) and in the community. Given that "actual" texture packs have been unsupported for over 7 years (and were never supported on Bedrock to begin with), it's pretty unlikely that someone looking for information about "texture packs" would be actually looking for this page. As such, I propose moving this page to [[Texture Pack/old]] or something similar, and replacing the current page with a redirect to [[Resource Pack]]. Is this a good idea? I'd like to hear other people's thoughts on this. - [[User:Luke18033|Luke18033]] ([[User talk:Luke18033|talk]]) 02:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
+:{{c|oppose}} for a few reasons
+# They are 2 very different things. It's like comparing [[Old Customized]] to [[Custom]]
+# Texture Pack/old is not a good idea. Subpages are not good and why make a subpage as a redirect?
+# As for someone looking for "texture packs", there is already a hatnote ontop.
+:All in all, I oppose.'''[[User:Humiebee|Humiebee]]<sup>[[User talk:Humiebee|talk]] [[Special:Contribs/Humiebee|contribs]]</sup>''' 03:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
+:: It doesn't need to be a subpage, that's just the first thing that came to mind. It could be [[Old Texture Pack]] or [[Texture Pack (old)]] instead. But the big ''outdated'' infobox at the top of the page makes it pretty obvious that this is an old feature so maybe this change isn't really necessary. - [[User:Luke18033|Luke18033]] ([[User talk:Luke18033|talk]]) 05:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)